Getting cold

You can feel it in the air, winter is coming. Yesterday I took a quick trip to the city and was back up in heaven a little after noon. Ty’s stitches fell out so he had to go back to Mom’s office for a quick clean up and band aid. Meanwhile Jag had an upset stomach so he stayed home.

Today we have lots to do at work and at home. All the doctors in Lori’s office are off to Chicago for a conference so she gets a mini break. She calculated annual raises and bonuses for her team and then went to present her case to Dr.C and he agreed. Even though she’s only been here for 9 weeks she has a really good handle on the office and her team, including all the docs. You still might not get the gravity of her job but she is 100% in charge of everyone, docs, nurses, surgery schedulers and anyone else (IT, etc.) that comes into her office. You all should be really proud of her as she’s doing a fantastic job.

It’s 7 am and we slept in so time to run and get everyone moving. Before I go, please read below for the truth about gun control. Some people in our society get caught up in the moment (the media and lots of dems) and ignore the facts as if you look at hard facts, there is no evidence, I repeat, no evidence, that gun control accomplishes anything. In fact, it does exactly the opposite. Don’t believe me? Read on for yourself, unless you’re too close minded and just want to go along with the talking points that make some people feel better about themselves rather than addressing the real problem which is the lack of mental health care in our country. Hope all’s well, God Bless.
THE PUBLIC POLICY
THE ‘GUN CONTROL’ FARCE
Its advocates are always short of any useful evidence.

By Thomas Sowell
President Obama’s intrusion into the mourning community of Roseburg, Oregon, in order to promote his political crusade for stronger gun control laws, is part of a pattern of his using various other sites of shooting rampages in the past to promote this long-standing crusade of the political left.

The zealotry of gun control advocates might make some sense if they had any serious evidence that more restrictive gun control laws actually reduce gun crimes. But they seldom even discuss the issue in terms of empirical evidence.

Saving lives is serious business. But claiming to be saving lives and refusing to deal with evidence is a farce. Nor is the Second Amendment or the National Rifle Association the real issue, despite how much the media and the intelligentsia focus on them.

If there is hard evidence that stronger gun control laws actually reduce gun crimes in general or reduce murders in particular, the Second Amendment can be repealed, as other Amendments have been repealed. Constitutional Amendments exist to serve the people. People do not exist to be sacrificed to Constitutional Amendments.

But if hard evidence shows that restrictions on gun ownership lead to more gun crimes, rather than less, then the National Rifle Association’s opposition to those restrictions makes sense, independently of the Second Amendment.

Since this all boils down to a question of hard evidence about plain facts, it is difficult to understand how gun control laws should have become such a heated and long-lasting controversy.
There is a huge amount of statistical evidence, just within the United States, since gun control laws are different in 50 different states and these laws have been changed over time in many of these states. There are mountains of data on what happens under restrictive laws and what happens when restrictions are lifted.

Chicago with the strictest gun control laws in the Country has the highest rate of murder and gun crime while states with the least control, have the least crime, period. These are the facts from our own government, not the NRA or the GOP. Yet those on the left or those who for political gain, still want to whip up their constituents by misleading people with words that are 100% false. Some reading this will still refuse to ignore the truth no matter what facts you present to them as they are brainwashed by their politicians and beliefs so they can no longer see facts no matter how clear they are.

Statistics on murder are among the most widely available statistics, and among the most accurate, since no one ignores a dead body. With so many facts available from so many places and times, why is gun control still a heated issue? The short answer is that most gun control zealots do not even discuss the issue in terms of hard facts.

The zealots act as if they just know — somehow — that bullets will be flying hither and yon if you allow ordinary people to have guns. Among the many facts this ignores is that gun sales were going up by the millions in late 20th century America, and the murder rate was going down at the same time.

Among the other facts that gun control zealots consistently ignore are data on how many lives are saved each year by a defensive use of guns. This seldom requires actually shooting. Just pointing a loaded gun at an assailant is usually enough to get him to back off, often in some haste.

There have been books and articles based on voluminous statistics, including statistics comparing gun laws and gun crime rates in different countries, such as Guns and Violence by Professor Joyce Lee Malcolm of George Mason University. Seldom do these factual studies back up what the gun control zealots are saying.

Why would an ultimately factual question about the consequences of gun control laws divide people along ideological lines? Only if at least one set of people were more devoted to their vision than to the facts.

This shows up when gun control zealots are asked whether whatever new law they propose would have prevented the shooting rampage that they are using as a stage from which to propose a new clampdown on gun ownership. Almost always, the new law being proposed would not have made the slightest difference. That too is part of the farce. A deadly farce.

So is the automatic assertion that whoever engaged in a shooting rampage was a madman. Yet these supposedly crazy shooters are usually rational enough to choose some “gun-free zone” for their murderous attacks. They seem more rational than gun control zealots who keep creating more “gun-free zones.”

Gun control zealots are almost always people who are lenient toward criminals, while they are determined to crack down on law-abiding citizens who want to be able to defend themselves and their loved ones.

Once you lose a right, it is virtually impossible to get it back! Think about it, and be honest with yourself!

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *